هلدینگ پانیدکو با مشارکت افراد با تجربه در صنایع بزرگ کشور تشکیل گردیده و استراتژی خود را بر مبنای سرمایه گذاری در صنایع مختلف کشور ، از جمله صنایع خودرو سازی قرار داده است .
تامین قطعات و مجموعه های با کیفیت و مطمئن جهت برآورده نمودن نیازهای صنایع خودرو سازی و حمل و نقل و بازار خدمات پس از فروش آنها جزو اقدامات اولیه این هلدینگ تعریف گردیده است.
برخی از صاحبان سهام هلدینگ پانیدکو ، خود صاحب شرکت و کارگاههای ساخت و تولید در زمینه های محتلف میباشند که ظرفیت کارگاههای خود را در اختیار هلدینگ قرار داده اند.

آدرس: تهران ، فلکه دوم صادقیه ، برج گلدیس، طبقه هفتم، واحد 721

تلفن: 021xxxxxxxx

ایمیل: info[at]panid-co.ir

کد پستی: 1234567890

Such researchers opposed 5-year consequence of SADI-S 250 (popular limb 250 cm) with RY-DS

Such researchers opposed 5-year consequence of SADI-S 250 (popular limb 250 cm) with RY-DS

Such researchers opposed 5-year consequence of SADI-S 250 (popular limb 250 cm) with RY-DS

  • SADI-S, a change in antique Roux-en-Y DS, are therefore recommended from the ASMBS while the the ideal metabolic bariatric surgical processes.
  • Book regarding a lot of time-identity safety and you can effectiveness consequences continues to be necessary which will be highly advised, such that have penned details on SG dimensions and you will popular station duration.
  • Investigation for these actions of licensed centers would be stated so you can new Metabolic and you may Bariatric Procedures Certification and you can Top quality Update Program database and you can by themselves filed because unmarried-anastomosis DS procedures to allow for appropriate research collection.
  • Around will still be issues about intestinal type, health situations, optimum limb how to delete three day rule account lengths, and you will much time-label weightloss/win back after that techniques. As such, ASMBS recommends a cautious approach to the brand new use from the processes, having awareness of ASMBS-blogged assistance on health and metabolic service out of bariatric patients, particularly to own DS patient.

Following the first year, EWL% (77

As up-to-date ASMBS declaration (Kallies and you can Rogers, 2020) endorses SADI-S since the right metabolic bariatric surgical procedure, in addition it highlights one to degree of enough time-term defense and efficacy continue to be necessary – a view that is backed by the studies demonstrated more than.

Furthermore, a keen UpToDate remark towards “Bariatric strategies on the management of big obesity: Descriptions” (Lim, 2020) claims that “Various other methods, and you to definitely-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) and you will single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass (SADI), are still felt investigational with regards to getting an elementary bariatric procedure”

Yashkov et al (2021) stated that there are only a small number of studies providing a comparison between SADI-S and Hess-Marceau’s BPD/Duodenal Switch (RY-DS) operations. Data of patients who underwent open SADI-S (n 226) and RY-DS (n 528) were retrospectively studied. EWL(%), EBMIL(%), TWL(%), anti-diabetic effect, complications, and revision rate were compared between the 2 groups. 0 % versus 73.3 %) and TWL% (39.4 % versus 38.9 %) were statistically significantly better after SADI-S (p < 0.01, and p < 0.05, respectively), but not EBMIL% (p > 0.05). At nadir to 24-36 months, EWL, TBWL, and EBMIL after SADI-S was comparable to the RY-DS group. Up to the 4th and 5th year, better weight loss (TBWL, EBMIL, EWL) was observed after RY-DS than after SADI-S. Early complication rate was less (2.65 %) in the SADI-S group versus 5.1 % in the RY-DS. Protein deficiency and small bowel obstruction rates were also lower after SADI-S; 93.4 % of patients achieved total remission of their diabetes; 7.5 % of patients in the SADI-S group had symptoms of bile reflux, which was a main indication for revisions. The authors concluded that SADI-S has many advantages over RY-DS; however, weight loss and anti-diabetic effects after the 3rd year were marginally lower after SADI-S compared to RY-DS. SADI-S was less dangerous in terms of malabsorption and appeared to be a reasonable alternative to RY-DS as a metabolic operation. RY-DS could be implemented for weight regain and/or bile reflux after SADI-S.

This study had several drawbacks. This was a retrospective analysis of 2 modifications of BPD/DS, one of which (RY-DS) had been performed between 2003 and 2015 and another one (SADI-S), since 2014. For this reason, these investigators compared more recent information regarding 5-year anti-diabetic effects of SADI-S with their preliminary published data regarding 5-year results of RY-DS. There was no learning curve period in the SADI-S group, but there was in RY-DS group. Although the initial weight of the patients in the SADI-S group was higher (p < 0.01), they were also taller, so there was no statistically significant difference in the initial BMI between the 2 groups. More patients from the SADI-S group suffered from diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2). In the period when thee investigators used SADI-S, a significant number of "easier" patients were suggested as candidates for a sleeve gastrectomy. In cases of DM2, SADI-S was preferable over a sleeve gastrectomy alone. Furthermore, the percentage of patients with DM2 has increased over the last 5 to 10 years because more patients considered their diabetes to be a more significant health problem than obesity itself. Another limitation was that both RY-DSs and SADI-Ss were performed by the authors using an open technique. Although laparotomies are infrequently used in metabolic surgery, in their experience both open RY-DSs and SADI-Ss could be performed safely by laparotomy with a minimal 30-day morbidity (0.38 % for RY-DS and 0.44 % for SADI-S) with low early morbidity (5.1 % and 2.65 % accordingly). In the recently published study from Brazil [Kim, 2016] using a laparoscopic technique, the authors demonstrated 18.9 % early complications after RY-DS and 13.3 % after SADI-S.

startitt
بدون نظر

ارسال یک نظر

نظر
نام
ایمیل
وبسایت