هلدینگ پانیدکو با مشارکت افراد با تجربه در صنایع بزرگ کشور تشکیل گردیده و استراتژی خود را بر مبنای سرمایه گذاری در صنایع مختلف کشور ، از جمله صنایع خودرو سازی قرار داده است .
تامین قطعات و مجموعه های با کیفیت و مطمئن جهت برآورده نمودن نیازهای صنایع خودرو سازی و حمل و نقل و بازار خدمات پس از فروش آنها جزو اقدامات اولیه این هلدینگ تعریف گردیده است.
برخی از صاحبان سهام هلدینگ پانیدکو ، خود صاحب شرکت و کارگاههای ساخت و تولید در زمینه های محتلف میباشند که ظرفیت کارگاههای خود را در اختیار هلدینگ قرار داده اند.

آدرس: تهران ، فلکه دوم صادقیه ، برج گلدیس، طبقه هفتم، واحد 721

تلفن: 021xxxxxxxx

ایمیل: info[at]panid-co.ir

کد پستی: 1234567890

Do you know the outcomes to be ghosted and just how manage cellular daters manage are ghosted? (RQ2)

Do you know the outcomes to be ghosted and just how manage cellular daters manage are ghosted? (RQ2)

Do you know the outcomes to be ghosted and just how manage cellular daters manage are ghosted? (RQ2)

A total of 41 respondents (29%) labeled the fresh new affordances of the app to spell it out as to the reasons it ghosted anyone else. Particular described the ease from ghosting (n = 32). It discussed it as being easier than just yourself rejecting another person given the privacy provided by the new app and the simple fact that there clearly was zero shared social networking. Someone else mentioned they deleted the brand new software which means that erased each of their discussions and you will connectivity (n = 9). Ultimately, specific participants and additionally asserted that this new excess regarding potential partners provided of the relationships app’s access to an enormous relationships pool contributed these to ghost someone else these were faster trying to find (letter = 5).

No obligations to communicate (letter = 31; 22%)

A more impressive set of respondents (letter = 29) declared they don’t are obligated to pay each other things and this ghosting falls under cellular dating application fool around with, which is regarding the very thought of cellular relationships ideologies just like the before told me. Due to the fact Melanie (twenty-seven, heterosexual) explains: “Really don’t owe one another a conclusion as We did not meet this person deal with-to-face.” At the same time, one or two respondents struggled to the fact that the reasons for having rejecting one another were not clear. It ergo looked more relaxing for them to ghost instead of to explore a direct break up approach because this would require supplying the other person a description.

Question towards the most other

Truly rejecting others isn’t simple and easy specific ghosters (letter = 23; 16%) did not must damage the other person from the verbally rejecting her or him. As a whole, 21 participants perceived it as becoming significantly more mundane to describe so you’re able to the other person as to the reasons it declined her or him (elizabeth.grams., maybe not glamorous/interesting sufficient) in lieu of to simply ghost one another. At exactly the same time, around three respondents said it ghosted while they don’t need certainly to hack each other by leading him or her towards and faking desire.

To complement the qualitative findings on why respondents ghost, ourtime we conducted a logistic regression (see Table 1) to examine H1 and to explore which demographic and situational variables explain who ghosts. The overall model was significant, ? 2 (7) = , p < 0.001, Cox and Snell R 2 = .17, and Nagelkerke R 2 = .23 and the model fit was good, Hosmer and Lemeshow test, ? 2 (8) = 6.57, p = .584. As expected, dating app frequency in the past 31 days was a significant predictor of ghosting others (B = ?.26*). However, contrarily to our expectations for H1, the frequency of dating app use decreased the likelihood of ghosting others: For every step decrease in dating app use, the odds to ghost increased with 1.30. Interestingly, gender was not a significant predictor of having ghosted, which means that the odds for women to ghost other dating app users are not significantly higher than the odds for men. Contrarily, age was a significant predictor of having ghosted others on dating apps. For every year decrease in age, the odds to ghost increased with 1.08. Participants' perceptions of others' ghosting experiences (both in terms of ghosting others and being ghosted by others) were not significantly associated with the likelihood to ghost. Similarly, having been ghosted by other dating app users was not significantly associated with the likelihood to ghost others, yet this could be because only 18 respondents were in the category that never experienced ghosting compared to 153 respondents in the category that had been ghosted.

When evaluating the newest emotional answers respondents must ghosting, the majority of respondents (n = 86) claimed impact sad or hurt adopting the ghosting sense. Other are not mentioned feelings was in fact impression upset (n = 65) and impression distressed or disillusioned (letter = 48). The latter will be illustrated of the Lennert’s (twenty five, homosexual) experience: “I desired to think in matchmaking so badly, but I am beginning to matter they over and over again. I do believe individuals you prefer significantly more education regarding it, they ruins the people matchmaking and helps to create undetectable agendas.” Because never assume all respondents quickly realized that they had been ghosted, several together with said they certainly were concerned as they thought one thing crappy had took place for the ghoster (letter = 16). Seven respondents thought ashamed which they was basically ghosted, while four felt alleviated which they had been ghosted because are an obvious sign one another was not a great fit. Ultimately, 28 respondents explicitly mentioned that they had virtually no emotional response towards the ghosting experience.

startitt
بدون نظر

ارسال یک نظر

نظر
نام
ایمیل
وبسایت